🔗 Share this article White House Condemns Nobel Peace Prize Choice as Prioritizing Politics Above Peace Efforts The White House has sharply criticized the Nobel selection committee's choice to grant the prestigious peace award to a candidate besides Donald Trump. Swift Response Following Award Declaration In the wake of the recent declaration that Venezuelan opposition politician María Corina Machado had been granted the international recognition, senior aides to the American leader condemned the selection panel as politicized while Norway prepared for a possible official reaction from the White House. "The awarding body demonstrated they place politics above peaceful efforts," declared Steven Cheung. Trump will "keep forging peace agreements, ending wars, and preserving lives," he continued. "He possesses the compassion of a peacemaker, and there will not be another like him who can accomplish great things with the absolute strength of his will." Context of the Former President's Nobel Campaign Trump had openly, though dismissively, advocated for the honor, pushing through a Gaza conflict resolution before the Friday announcement by the Nobel selection panel – a consideration that foreign officials and former negotiators said had impact in his schedule for a peace agreement. The US leader had also petitioned high-level Norway representatives and was supported for the award by his political allies, who appeared in media this timeframe to insist that the committee award Trump for his efforts in the Middle East. Panel's Declaration on Anti-Democratic Trends In its announcement, the Norwegian committee attacked the rising tide of political repression in Venezuela and in nations around the globe. The message was quickly embraced by political adversaries, who saw it as a relatively clear rebuke at the US president's use of the defense resources in US urban areas and pressure on his opponents at home. "When repressive regimes seize power, it is vitally important to honor fearless protectors of freedom who step forward and resist," the panel wrote. "Free societies requires people who voice opposition, who dare to step forward despite grave risk, and who make us aware that democratic rights must never be taken for granted, but must always be defended – with dialogue, with determination and with determination." Expert Views on the Situation A senior research fellow, a expert analyst for the region at the Chatham House thinktank, theorized Trump would be "peeved" by the decision. "He had advocated shamelessly for this honor, even overstating his role to peace globally. He has deployed substantial defense assets at great political cost to him, truthfully, off the coast of Venezuela. And then the recognition he most desired gets awarded from him by the person he is allegedly protecting. I can't see how this will be received positively for a individual who wears personal grievance on his openly." Sabatini suspected Nicolás Maduro's administration would be upset about the prize decision. "However it may even be – given Donald Trump's probable private feelings to this – that it could even function a somewhat to their benefit."