🔗 Share this article

"A significant portion of my personal history is archived on Snapchat, and suddenly they want us to cover the cost for it."

One-star reviews and a feeling of unfairness have dominated social media conversations since Snapchat became the latest technology company to put a price tag on a service that people previously enjoyed using for at no cost.

Snap revealed in last month that it would require payment from subscribers if they have over five gigabytes of saved images and clips stored as the Memories feature.

For many, these past uploads act as a portal to bygone days – prompting some to accuse the corporation of "money-hungry tactics" in messages on social media and unfavorable ratings on digital storefronts.

Other Choices

The company has equated its paid storage plans to those provided by Apple and Google for handsets.

As another possibility for users unwilling to subscribe, subscribers may save their saved content – which for some cover tens of gigabytes – to their own hardware.

The firm mentioned that only a small number of members would be affected by the changes.

It also acknowledged that it was "inherently difficult to transition from receiving a service for free to paying for it" – but proposed it would be "a valuable investment" for members.

Many opposing the change online appear unconvinced.

User Backlash

A digital campaign labeled the cost a "memory tax", with users labeling it "bleak" and "absurd" – while an individual promised never to use the application again.

Meanwhile, in a negative rating on the app marketplace, a individual calling themselves an online commenter said it felt "morally questionable".

"Based on my understanding of millennials, many people have extensive archives of recorded experiences on Snapchat," they commented. "The vast majority only remained on the platform primarily for that feature. Such limited storage is inadequate when you have a long timeline of recordings... Goodbye to the app."

And, Guste Ven, a university student aspiring reporter in the UK capital, revealed on a social network her intention to uninstall the application.

"I made up my mind that I needed to download all my archived media as quickly as possible," she explained. "Almost all of my teenage years have been recorded through my saved snaps, all of the pictures in there are really important to me."

"This seems illogical to introduce fees people for a feature that has been complimentary for such a long time."

Unspecified Pricing

The company has not disclosed how much premium options would be priced at in the UK – only that they are part of a "phased international launch".

However a young adult another user, who also lives in London, commented in a post on the video service that she would be "distraught" by these fees.

The user explained that the service had become "a part of everyday life" since she began accessing it in 2014.

While she said she recognized the app needed to earn income, Amber suggested that the Memories feature means more to users than the company may have anticipated.

"Personally, I believe it's a rather unjust decision to demand payment from your customers who have been consistent and engaged," she said. "These aren't just called Memories, these are our real-life recollections."

Expert Analysis

Businesses deciding to charge from subscribers for a service that was previously free is a frequent occurrence, and countless individuals cover the cost of services like iCloud and Google Drive to save their photos and videos from their mobile device.

The fact of storing data in the online servers – which some in the tech industry like to refer to as essentially "an external server" – is that it involves expenses.

"Managing vast amounts of saved content on Snapchat demands considerable investment," digital strategist Matt Navarra stated. "The platform has to try to find a method to offset the expenses of storage, network usage, back-ups, file sharing, security measures – all that stuff."

However the expert indicated that introducing fees for a feature that had earlier required no payment, and users had been invited to access as such, may seem like a "deceptive practice" for many people.

"Changing the rules after individuals have accumulated this huge digital archive feels inappropriate," he said. In the view of countless individuals, he stated, "Memories aren't just data dumps, they're emotional artefacts."

The opinion was shared by those submitting negative feedback, with a user describing their Snapchat photos and videos "extremely valuable to me".

"[Memories] have every aspect of my personal journey within them from joyful events like births, sad moments of loss, experiences shared with close ones, [and] my whole teenage years," they commented.

Expert Analysis

An academic expert, a postdoctoral researcher at an educational establishment in the Netherlands, stated that Snapchat's move shows the consequences of business-oriented apps being used to archive meaningful individual recordings.

"Platforms gain from this reliance, mutual reliance, and assumption of perpetual availability, which even encourages many people to stay on the service or keep accessing it in order to revisit their saved content," she informed the BBC. "But these are not benevolent guardians of individual recollection."