🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media sent from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing amendments to a draft bill that include lowering the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to several government departments and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about business sector influence with medical guidelines. Recently, international health experts issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN summit conference,” said Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Through correspondence, BAT suggests this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “following international suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than one year after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass 65% of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

BAT asks for the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The draft bill suggests penalties for different infractions “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the company executive of the African subsidiary says the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the related medical consequences” but asserts that “specific rules can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We exist in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and collect the yield and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Official corporate statement

The corporate communicator stated: “The corporation runs its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Additionally, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, they said, mentioning that minors should be shielded from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, adding that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which encompasses growing volumes of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.